Television is not only a source of visual entertainment but
a means of relieving boredom. There exists the old school, which believes in
reviving tradition and in remaining deep rooted followed by the new school, which is into glorifying anything and everything to gain viewership. I was surprised
to see a leading actress and her fiancé face the heat in a recent interview on
a leading Malayalam channel. Their romance was being publicly exposed, imposing
questions on its credibility like, if the actress took the right decision by
getting engaged to a married man who was seeking divorce from his first wife.
There were rebellious justifications from the couple's side followed by fiery
questions by the journalist. The couple shared their happy times which were
juxtaposed with tears, too. I couldn't understand the big scene that was
created to entice spectators. It's a fact that the couple faced this interview
with courage and the demeaning process of exposing their personal space was
done with their consent. But, the channel would have never come up with such a
steaming concept if there weren't any spectators, right? What fun do we, as
spectators, get in showing such worthless curiosity in someone's agony? I mean,
coming to think of it, whether they get married or not is really not our
business!! What have we come down to as viewers, and most importantly as
humans?
Even in the recent Guwahati molestation case, though the girl's face was blurred, her stripping was evident in the video which was being replayed throughout the day. It was Times Now that took the humbling decision of not telecasting it anymore, as it made no sense. While we may never stop referring to the TV as the 'Idiot box' .. who are the actual idiots here - creative channel people who cater such insensitivity , or the viewers who buy it ?!?